"Cheerfulness, it would appear, is a matter which depends fully as much on the state of things within, as on the state of things without and around us." Charlotte Brontë

Monday, December 19, 2011

Humor

I've thought about humor a lot lately--what makes us laugh, but more of what should make us laugh. You know what I'm talking about--sometimes you're watching a movie, and an off-color joke comes up, and you find yourself simultaneously laughing and scolding yourself for laughing. I don't really understand this when it happens to me--I suppose it's all a part of the gap between what I know and what I do. Integrity and all that.
I want to focus on a specific kind of humor, though: humor at the expense of others. I thought about this as I was playing games with my friends recently. The game we were playing turned into teasing "humor." As I watched those making the jokes laughing, I also observed the reactions of those who were the butt of the joke. A lot of times, their laughter seemed forced. Here's the thing I don't get--I'm pretty sure no one actually enjoys being made fun of. I suppose there are some situations where it's not hurtful, but for the most part, when someone makes fun of your appearance, your personality, etc. it's only really making everyone else laugh. We all play it off because no one wants to seem insecure or overly-sensitive or be the killjoy, but I think these type of jokes only serve to make people more insecure--even if imperceptibly. What makes us think it's okay to highlight and mock things someone has no control over (personal appearance/features) or something each individual is struggling to get control over (character/personality)? Even if it's supposedly "all in good fun?"
We discussed humor in my social psychology course--men, as a general rule, use more humor that is at the expense of others, also known as "aggressive humor." Women, as a general rule, use more self-deprecatory humor. From an evolutionary standpoint, men seek to be strong in comparison with those around them since they are the "protectors" and "providers"--for that reason, humor which targets weaknesses of others would serve their ends. Women, on the other hand, are the "nurturers," and therefore seek to make those around them feel comfortable and cared for. I think the gender differences in humor have lessened by a lot this century as independent, self-sufficient women are smiled upon more. But this means that more of us are using aggressive humor.
As I ponder the humor I find in those I care about most, the best example of humor that I can think of is my aunt Jane.

Jane, along with my Grandma Colleen and all her children (including my own dad), is one of the most caring people I know. I want to be her when I grow up. She is a master at making people feel at home and at highlighting and discovering their strengths and talents. Jane's humor is never at the expense of others--she loves to laugh at her own quirks and make others laugh with her. There's a difference between self-deprecating and self-defeating humor. To me it seems that healthy humor would be in hopes of getting someone to laugh with you rather than simply to laugh at you. Showing that we find humor in situations and circumstances we're placed in allows others to connect with us, making us more human to those around. Aggressive humor estranges others and places the joker and the object of the joke on different planes. Psychological studies show aggressive humor to be positively correlated with hostility and aggression. "Self-enhancing humor," where we find humor through our perspective on situations and circumstances, is positively correlated with cheerfulness, self-esteem, optimism, psychological well-being, and satisfaction with social support. Even if we think we're not hurting others with humor at their expense, it's hurting us.
If anyone is interested on what church leaders have to say about humor, here are some good excerpts I found:
From "If We Can Laugh At It, We Can Live With It"--a fantastic talk on humor.
There are times...when not everyone is laughing. We must be careful to distinguish between genuine humor, which everyone can enjoy, and hurtful humor, which is at someone else’s expense.
Even a hasty “just kidding” doesn’t excuse put-downs and other rude forms of hurtful humor. People may play along with the joke and even manage a little artificial laugh for the sake of the audience, but the resulting wounds go deep. Many remember hurtful comments for years, and relationships may be damaged or destroyed.
The scriptures instruct us to strengthen one another in all our conversations (see D&C 108:7). Humor should be used to build and uplift. Jokes are more fun when they help people feel good about themselves, not embarrassed. 
From Elder Holland's advice on dating and courtship,
“In a dating and courtship relationship, I would not have you spend five minutes with someone who belittles you, who is constantly critical of you, who is cruel at your expense and may even call it humor. Life is tough enough without having the person who is supposed to love you lead the assault on your self-esteem, your sense of dignity, your confidence, and your joy. In this person’s care you deserve to feel physically safe and emotionally secure."
From "Is Anyone Laughing?":
Keeping a sense of humor helps us endure the trials of life. It is truly medicine to the soul (see Proverbs 17:22). However, not all humor is good humor. Elder Robert E. Wells of the First Quorum of the Seventy wrote: “For some people, sharp questions or quick rejoinders are habits. Criticism is a form of humor for them, and they enjoy feeling superior when they see someone else’s discomfort. This is a tragic, sinful attitude that must be changed” (“Overcoming Those Differences of Opinion,” Ensign, Jan. 1987, 60–61). 
We should be able to joke around with our friends, but there is a big difference between having fun with joking and making fun through joking. True friends help you feel better about yourself. They don’t try to make themselves feel better at your expense. True friends enjoy mutual trust as much as they enjoy a good laugh. True friends allow you to let your guard down instead of always requiring you to keep your defenses up.
How do you know if your comments are building or hurting, just plain fun or crossing the line? Here is a test: How many times do you have to follow your comments up with the words just kidding? People think they can say whatever they want and then excuse their insensitivity with a quick, “Just kidding.” It’s a cop-out.
God did not send us here to degrade each other, but to bless each other. The scriptures instruct us to strengthen one another in all our conversations (see D&C 108:7).
Most people realize that what they see on many TV programs is not real. They are able to recognize fake backdrops, fake snowflakes, and fake characters. So why is it so hard to recognize fake laughter? Negative humor hurts, and the resulting wounds go deep. In real life no one is laughing. Not really. Many remember careless comments for years. 
From "The Sensitive Way:"
Sometimes, too, our humor may be at the expense of others. Is there a barb in our joke? Could it hurt someone? Do we know the other person’s sensitive areas well enough to make what we feel is a humorous comment? 
President Hinckley's fantastic talk "The Need for Greater Kindness" doesn't speak of humor specifically, but it's a great reminder about kindness and charity.
Laughter and humor are wonderful parts of life, but I think we could all take a closer look at our humor, how it's affecting others, and what it says about ourselves. My personal goal is to have more charity even in humor.
And charity suffereth long, and is kind, and envieth not, and is not puffed up, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil, and rejoiceth not in iniquity but rejoiceth in the truth, beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.

Friday, December 9, 2011

Happy Christmas, self!

So, I'm really good at buying gifts for myself. And today I did just that. I bought myself a new camera. I looked through my pictures from last year in Paris, and I totally miss my old camera. It died my second day in Thailand. It lasted about 2 years, which isn't so great. But it sure went through a lot. I loved my Panasonic Lumix TMZ something-or-other.
Today I bought myself this:

I'm no photographer, so a DSLR wasn't a practical way to spend my money. But this baby...she's less than I paid for my TMZ model. So maybe I'll sell my old Canon PowerShot point-and-shoot for a hundred bucks or something. It's still in great shape. I gave my mom the camera I bought in Thailand (rawwwwr...still makes me mad how much I paid for that thing, and that it's not even sold in the U.S.)
Anyway, I'm pretty excited to get it in the mail and try it out. And I bought a legit case for it as well. Maybe I'll regret this purchase, but I don't think so.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

A Premature Bucket List

I'm one of those people who gets uber over-excited for things way in advance and counts my chickens before they hatch and all that. So, in the true spirit of being ME, I started making my bucket list for when (or "if" would be more appropriate, I suppose) I'm in the U.K. for graduate school next fall. Here are the things on that very premature list:



France--I love love love Paris. Like the song on Anastasia says, ♫Paris holds the key to my heart♫. This time, though, I'm determined to see parts I haven't yet seen. Perhaps Strasbourg, Lyon, Toulouse, Bordeaux?
Strasbourg
Lyon
Toulouse
Bordeaux
Greece--I've had so many mixed reviews about Greece, that I think I need to check it out for myself, whether that's Athens or Santorini. Or both?
Athens
Santorini
Turkey--Istanbul I have heard great things about. Also, while I'm in the Middle East, I will fulfill my dream of seeing Jerusalem. Abso-frickin-lutely.
Istanbul
Jerusalem
Germany--This is dedicated to Dad. But I really do want to go, and I have for quite some time. I'm thinking Heidelberg or Hamburg. 
Heidelberg (okay, someone went a little crazy with the "saturation" toy on photo editing)
Hamburg
Spain--YES, I will go to Spain. San Sebastian, perhaps? I'm determined. 
San Sebastian
Amsterdam--The Netherlands are always spoken highly of by those who've been. And who am I to ignore people's advice?
Amsterdam
Belgium--Brugge, Ghent, maybe Brussels. I was supposed to go on a day-tour in Belgium last year, but I chose the Loire Valley instead. So this time, it's Belgium or bust.
Brugge
Leona Lewis concert--I've been wanting to go to one, but she doesn't tour much in the U.S. Plus, if I'm at UCL, I'm living in Leona land--she grew up in Islington.
Leona
Another Jude Law-type experience--I paid 10 quid to see him in Hamlet in Leicester Square. Also, I slept on the street in a garbage bag to get the ticket. But I'm so down for another experience like that.
Jude in Hamlet
Ireland--I'm determined to give it a second chance because I'm absolutely sure Ireland is everything I ever dreamed it would be. This time I'll skip out on Wicklow and Dublin, though.
Glendalough
Eilean Donan Castle, Scotland--parts of Highlander were filmed here. I haven't seen that, but that won't stop me. 
Eilean Donan
Caerlaverock Castle, Dumfries, Scotland--Family Castle? No brainer!

Caerlaverock
Canterbury--see picture and/or Canterbury Tales
Canterbury
The New Forest--I like forests, in general, and this one's in Southern England
New Forest
Brighton--For sure for sure I'm hitting up Brighton in all of its 19th-century glory
Brighton Royal Pavilion
The Giant's Causeway--in Northern Ireland. Check out the pic. 
Giant's Causeway
Portmeirion--North Wales. 'Nuff said.
Portmeirion (once again, with the saturation overload)
The Eden Project--This thing looks legit. AND it's in Cornwall. 
Eden Project
Kenilworth Castle--Definitely want to make it here since we didn't make it there on Wales Study Abroad, and some big events in history happened here (possibly involving a certain historical character I may or may not have a crush on)
Kenilworth
The Cotswolds--Everybody asks me if I saw the Cotswolds when I was in England. I have to say no, I didn't. And to think I was actually in Gloucester without seeing them. Blast.
The Cotswolds
The Lake District--another one everyone asks me if I've seen. That's a negative. So far.
The Lake District
Chatsworth House--supposedly Jane Austen based Pemberley off of this place.

Chatsworth House
Right now you're thinking I'm crazy to think I'll visit all these places during a schoolyear. It's not feasible, I'm sure. But I will visit at least some of them. Even if I don't end up there next  year for school (heaven forbid), I'm going to take a travel expedition to salve my poor, deprived spirit. And I wouldn't mind some good company, either.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Gross, I know

Recently my top left gum has been sore. I was worried that this means I need to go to the dentist. However, yesterday something quite exciting happened: a corn kernel skin came out of my gum. I know, it's disgusting. It was in there for a couple of weeks. I had suspected that this was culprit, but what did you want me to do? How do you fish out something that's completely embedded in your gums? I'm just happy it came out, even though I wonder how it did.
That's my story for the day.

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Work in progress

Once upon a time I didn't know who I was. True story. These last few months I've been feelin' a bit confused about being "Martha" and all that entails. Who is Martha, anyway? Well, I'll tell you this: right now she's a mildly confused person who's figuring out who she is and how to be that--whatever "that" is.
I was thinking about this whole situation today and how I sometimes feel like a very different person depending on the group I'm with. Chameleon syndrome, and all that. No me gusta eso. But in some ways, I don't think it's an all bad thing. I've grown up with my two feet in two very different spheres, so I've learned how to adapt to both of those spheres. Cultural liminality is what they call it--someone who's not quite a part of either culture but rather sitting on the threshold. Is it a bad thing to be able to function in both frames? I think (and hope) the answer is "no." The part that's worrisome to me is contained in the definition of liminality:
The term is used to “refer to in-between situations and conditions that are characterized by the dislocation of established structures, the reversal of hierarchies, and uncertainty regarding the continuity of tradition and future outcomes
I don't mind dislocating established structures or reversing hierarchies, but uncertainty about future outcomes? Not a big fan of that. What to do?
In addition to this liminality, I have sometimes felt like I never got to figure out who I was because I got into a long relationship right out of high school and centered my life around someone. Not just any someone, either. Someone from a very different background than myself, and someone who proved to be unworthy of this position in my life. Badly done, self. But I digress. The point is, now I'm having to restructure myself. And so now, here I am, 24 years old but really only 18 in a lot of ways. I admit that this has gotten me down a bit of late. But then I thought, "That's an awful way to look at it, self. How about you think of it as an opportunity?" And indeed, it is an opportunity. No need to be self-conscious and worry so much about what everyone thinks of "me;" I interact with too many very different people to make a pursuit of people-pleasing. Confidence can't come from that source, so I need to stop outsourcing. Makes me think of that trite phrase I kind of dislike even though it's true: Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. Thanks, André Gide (at least that's who Google claims is responsible for the quote.)
So yeah, remodeling kinda sucks because it means construction, change, and inconvenience; but it also means I get to pick out the new wallpaper, the carpet, the furnishings, the decor. And even if people come to my house and think, "GOSH, that's an ugly house," at least the one who lives there likes it. Gotta own it, right? "Don't be insecure, girl. Own that ponytail. Work that updo."
So right now I'm a work in progress, and even if the construction takes as long as the I-15 core project (geez, I sure hope not), at least I know that the end result is gonna be dang good.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Burstin'

Okay, I don't remember the last time I was this excited. I'm pretty much bursting. I thought I'd check on my UCL application to see if any headway had been made on the decision, but my expectations were very low. Wouldn't they send me an email if a decision had been reached on my application? Apparently not, since I got on and saw "Unconditional offer" on the application status.
WOOHOO!! It's such a relief to be accepted to a London school, especially since the program is International Child Health. My references must have talked me up real good, since I'm still somewhat mystified by getting accepted anywhere. I mean, UCL is a great school. Not to live in the past or anything, but in 2009, this is what the world rankings looked like:


Times Higher Education-QS World University Rankings 2009

TOP 200 WORLD UNIVERSITIES

2007 RANK2006 RANKNAMECOUNTRYPEER REVIEW SCOREEMPLOYER REVIEW SCORESTAFF/STUDENT SCORECITATIONS/STAFF SCOREINTERNATIONAL STAFF SCOREINTERNATIONAL STUDENT SCOREOVERAL SCORE
11Harvard UniversityUS100100981008578100.0
23University of CambridgeUK10010010089989699.6
32Yale UniversityUS1009910094857799.1
47University College LondonUK989910090969999.0
5=6Imperial College LondonUK100100100809810097.8
5=4University of OxfordUK10010010080969797.8
78University of ChicagoUS100999788778396.8
812Princeton UniversityUS1009682100898196.6
99Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUS10010089100319596.1
105California Institute of TechnologyUS9972871001008995.9
1110Columbia UniversityUS100999792288995.6
1211University of PennsylvaniaUS96998598826094.2
1313=Johns Hopkins UniversityUS987910099287194.1
1413=Duke UniversityUS959710093296292.9
1515Cornell UniversityUS100998594287392.5
1617Stanford UniversityUS10010071100259692.2
1716Australian National UniversityAustralia100917574999290.5
1820McGill UniversityCanada100979261679590.4
1918University of MichiganUS99998581575289.9
20=23University of EdinburghUK97998465938689.3
So...yeah, I'd say I'm pretty stoked about my acceptance there. Take that, Johns Hopkins! Hopkins is number one in the U.S. for Public Health, and yet they're ranked a measly 13 behind UCL's #4 spot. UCL is the 3rd oldest university in England--that's after Oxford and Cambridge (which, in all fairness, are wayyy older than UCL). It's also the first university to admit students of any race, class, or religion. Go, progress! It's in the Bloomsbury area of London, right by King's Cross, the British Museum, Great Ormond Street Hospital, and a bunch of other awesome things.
Anywho, that news definitely made my day, plus some. Hallelujah!!

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

I'm protected from drunkenness

Wikipedia snippet for the day:
Amethyst is a violet variety of quartz often used in jewelry. The name comes from the Ancient Greek  a- ("not") and μέθυστοςmethustos ("intoxicated"), a reference to the belief that the stone protected its owner from drunkenness.
There we go, ladies and gents! Good thing I bought my birthstone ring in Thailand--that's probably why I had supernatural abilities to refuse all of the alcoholic drinks the other volunteers were constantly drinking.

Monday, November 14, 2011

ANYONE can get money for school, as long as...

From my scholarship searches thus far, I thought I'd put together an example of the standard eligibility requirements for any scholarship of appreciable value. Here goes.

Applicants must:
-Be natives of Azerbaijan who have moved to Misrata, Libya in the past 3 years
-Be a self-proclaimed member of the LGBT community
-Be studying the uses of petroleum in the War on Terrorism
-Be applying to study at Slippery Rock University (I didn't make that up)
-Be an alumna/alumnus of Hood College
-Have suffered from eczema since age 4
-Have an older brother named Jonathan Magnus Bloomsberg

Okay, maybe that's exaggerating a smidge, but not much. I get all excited when I see grants and scholarships that cover tuition and living expenses--or even those that offer $1,000. Then invariably I realize how far off I am from the requirements. Someday when I'm rich, I'm going to create a scholarship fund, and I'm going to set my own requirements based off of my unique life story:

Applicants must:
-Be the 6th child of 8 (eliminates pretty much any Europeans or Asians)
-Have graduated from BYU with a degree in French Studies (to be used interchangeably with "Have graduated from BYU with a worthless degree"??)
-Be total unqualified for and yet have every intention of studying public health at a U.K. university
-Be a white, middle-class female with average intelligence
-Have no middle name

Take that, student hopefuls!

Monday, November 7, 2011

Cyber namedropping, anyone?

So, I'm reading the news on ksl.com, and there's this cute story about an 8 yr-old who saved his sister from being strangled by a sled rope. I was surprised to see all the comments on the story, so I checked it out. Here was one of the comments:
What a great story. I know the kids and the parents and I am so proud of them all. Roman is such a great kid and mom and dad taught him what to do. Way to go Roman, you are a hero even if you don't think you are. I will buy you dessert when I see you again.
Okay, I totally agree that this kid is the bees' knees. It's the last sentence that seems a bit off to me. How many 8 year-olds do you know who read the news online, much less the comment boards? If you really know the child and the parents, maybe your "I will buy you dessert when I see you again" comment is better directed at the child himself by way of a phone call? Otherwise it sounds a tad like you're just trying to namedrop and give yourself a public pat on the back for knowing the family and for being so appreciative of little Roman. Just a suggestion. Or maybe I'm just jealous I don't get to buy Roman dessert next time I see him.
In other news, today I saw a little reminder on campus that made me happy. It said: "To the knees, please! Skirts must come to the knee. Leggings are not pants!" Thank you, BYU. I wish girls everywhere would adhere to the same rule.
Yesterday Tim came by the house to bring my car back and to get a haircut. Twas bittersweet.
I wish I had as much hair as that kid. 

Lastly, today I'm wearing my lucky scarf. Actually, I've never worn it before, so I don't know if it's lucky. Today will be the test. Go, Wales. Cymru am byth...



Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Ella

Last night I painted my nails and watched Ella Enchanted by myself. Yayerrr! I love nights like that.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

You GOTTA be kidding me...

Today, I read this statement in an online thread: "Your statment is based on your religious belief therefore it is irrelevent and invalid."  Really, people? The pseudo-intellectual comments all over the internet blow my mind. Because anyone has religious convictions, they must naturally be brain-dead and incapable of coherent thought, right? 
If anyone is being narrow-minded in all these political/religious discussions, it is those who discount the views and beliefs of the religious simply because they can't conceive a way of "knowing" other than the scientific method. They believe whatever science "proves" to them. Science is one discipline of many, made up of theories and hypotheses that are constantly being disproved and altered. All of these theories and hypotheses are potentially falsifiable. C.S. Lewis said it so well:
Every scientific statement in the long run, however complicated it looks, really means something like, "I pointed the telescope to such and such a part of the sky at 2:20 A.M. on January 15th and saw so-and-so," or "I put some of this stuff in a pot and heated it to such-and-such a temperature and it did so-and-so." Do not think I am saying anything against science; I am only saying what its job is. And the more scientific a man is, the more (I believe) he would agree with me that this is the job of science--and a very useful and necessary job it is too. But why anything comes to be there at all, and whether there is anything behind the things science observes--something of a different kind--this is not a scientific question. If there is "Something Behind," then either it will have to remain altogether unknown to men or else make itself known in some different way. The statement that there is any such thing, and the statement that there is no such thing, are neither of them statements that science can make. And real scientists do not usually make them. It is usually the journalists and popular novelists who have picked up a few odds and ends of half-baked science from textbooks who go in for them. After all, it is really a matter of common sense. Supposing science ever became complete so that it knew every single thing in the whole universe. Is it not plain that the questions, "Why is there a universe?" "Why does it go on as it does?" "Has it any meaning?" would remain just as they were?
From my observation, those who are truly intelligent are the people who have religious convictions which they uphold despite scientific "evidence" to the contrary. What kind of backbone does it take to go along with whatever science has most recently proven, simultaneously ignoring certain moral and behavioral absolutes? None at all. That's the easy road. You've let someone else do all the work for you.  It takes true brain and a strong spine to believe something even though science may currently say otherwise. F. Scott Fitzgerald said this:
 The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.
The end.

Monday, October 17, 2011

Blast from a Beautiful Past

I was just thinking about the great experiences I've had in the past few years and thought I'd allow myself some reminiscing through pictures. These are from my time in Europe during Summer 2007. What a great experience.
Picadilly Circus

Greenwich

Parliament

Eye of London

Tower Bridge

Tower of London

Tower Bridge

London

Westminster Abbey

Trafalgar Square


Houses of Parliament

Jardins de Luxembourg

Train from Switzerland

Interlaken, Switzerland

Interlaken

Interlaken

Swiss Alps

The highest peak of the Alps--Jungen

Bern, Switzerland

Luxembourg



Mozarteum, Salzburg

Salzburg, Austria

Salzburg Fortress

Venice at night


Venice

Venice

Rialto

Venice

Our hostel courtyard

Venice train station

Les Tuileries

Palais Royal gardens

Palais Royal

Palais Royal

Basilique Saint Clothilde

La Conciergerie at night

Notre Dame at night

Pont Neuf and La Samaritaine

La Tour Eiffel



Eiffel Tower

Etoile

La Tour Eiffel


Tour Montparnasse from the Eiffel Tower

Notre Dame

Notre Dame

Conches sur Gondoire

Le Louvre

Sacré Coeur

Paris Plage

Sainte Chappelle

La Conciergerie


Provins

Provins

Provins Medieval Town

Provins

Conches

The walk from Bussy to Conches

Luxembourg Gardens

Palais du Sénat



Père Lachaise

Petit Palais

Catacombs

Versailles

Versailles

Versailles gardens





Paris Metro

Grande Arche de la Défense

Carnavalet Museum


Sacré Coeur

Hôtel de Ville

Saint Germain l'Auxerrois

La Tour Eiffel


Parc Monceau

Parc Monceau

Parc Buttes-Chaumont




Le Louvre, La Tour Eiffel

Château de Vincennes



Grand Palais

Paris

Rain at the Louvre


La Seine

Notre Dame de Paris

Toulon


Ile des Embiez




Toulon